corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 959

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

White M.
Tighter controls promised on drug claims: Pharmaceutical companies to be forced to publish details of side-effects
The Guardian 2005 Apr 12


Full text:

Pharmaceutical companies will be forced to publish the findings of all their clinical trials, including potentially adverse side effects, as a condition for obtaining a UK marketing licence for new drugs, Labour’s election manifesto will promise tomorrow.

It would mean that both doctors and patients would be able to check the downside of “wonder drugs” being promoted by the big global firms simply by logging on to an agreed website which meets internationally endorsed standards of openness.

The proposed change, which would require legislation in the next parliament, would help to restore public trust on both sides of the Atlantic, after confidence in the industry was undermined by a series of scares.

The move, proposed by the health secretary, John Reid, follows years of controversy and concern about such drug groups as anti-depressants, which are widely suspected of making children or young people suicidal or aggressive.

An 18-month inquiry by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority
(MHRA) concluded last December that there was no firm evidence of drugs such as Prozac and Seroxat causing self-harm or suicide in adults, unlike its conclusion a year earlier that young people were at risk. It recommended monitoring of the under-30s and steps to ensure depressed patients do not exceed the stated dose. But the royal colleges of medicine and mental health charities still complain that the regulator had seen only the firms’ own summaries of the clinical trials.

“People sometimes wonder if early warning signs of the downside haven’t been missed or concealed,” a Labour official said.

The side effects of anti-stroke drugs such as Vioxx and other inhibitor medicines have also been the subject of concern.

Some drug companies have been caught out not publishing data which did not support their own claims about the benefits from potentially profitable discoveries.

As a result of disappointing results from health minister Lord Warner’s efforts to encourage more voluntary openness – encouraged by the industry’s own association – the wording of tomorrow’s manifesto will state: “We will require registration of all clinical trials and publication of their findings for all trials of medical products with a marketing authorisation in the UK.”

In practice it will mean that new drugs would be licensed only if their trial data was published in a “peer review” journal – the top medical magazines – or on a recognisable database, such as the MHRA’s website or others approved by the World Health Organisation, within three months of getting the licence.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909