corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 9215

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Emmerton L, Gow DJ, Benrimoj SI.
Dimensions of pharmacists' preferences for cough and cold products
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 1994 Oct; 3:


Abstract:

To develop a comprehensive list of potential influences on pharmacists’ preferences for non-prescription cough and cold products, qualitative methods and review of the literature were used to develop a list of 42 influences on pharmacists’ preferences for these products; a mail survey of 1200 community pharmacists followed. Sixty-six percent of pharmacists responded. Factor analysis reduced the 42 influences to 7 factors, namely, advertising (13.65%), non-scientific (product; 6.96%), non-scientific (social; 4.7%), financial (31.3%), experience/economics (2.86%), clinical (2.15%) and restriction/ingredients (1.61%) influences. It was concluded that these factors indicate the dimensions of pharmacists’ preference for non-prescription cough and cold products and may be further analyzed to determine their relative influence in explaining preference for specific products.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.