corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8956

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Stafford A, Murphy K.
Drug firm paid for MP's forum, book
The Age (Melbourne) 2007 Jan 17
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/01/16/1168709752856.html#


Full text:

A MULTINATIONAL pharmaceutical company specialising in drugs for diabetes paid for an assistant to help a federal politician organise a forum on obesity.

Novo Nordisk gave Tasmanian Liberal senator Guy Barnett $40,000 towards his annual Healthy Lifestyle Forum last year, the senator said after revealing the sponsorship in the pecuniary interest register.

He used the money to pay for air fares, hiring and catering for the forum as well as hiring a part-time assistant from March to October.

The company also helped pay for a book on obesity edited by Senator Barnett, a member of the Government’s health policy committee and a long-time campaigner on obesity.

Novo Nordisk makes the long-acting insulin drug Levemir, which the Government last year agreed to subsidise for people with type 1 diabetes after a recommendation by the independent Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee.

University of Newcastle pharmacologist David Henry said while there was no direct link between Novo Nordisk’s commercial interests and the forum – it does not sell obesity drugs – it was a bad idea “for parliamentarians to be going to the industry looking for funding … no matter how well-intentioned”.

If there was a belief that things such as the forum were important, “then the Government itself should commit the funds”.

To patient groups and politicians, money from a pharmaceutical company “may seem like a lifeline, but in taking the money they lose their objectivity and their independence, which is one of their most powerful assets”, Professor Henry said.

And any subsequent lobbying for particular policies could be seen in the light of the support they got from the drug company.

“They must understand that they may weaken what it is they are trying to achieve, because these companies very definitely have a reason for doing (what they do). They want to obtain markets for their drugs,” he said.

But Senator Barnett and Novo Nordisk denied any conflict of interest in the company’s support of the forum.

“I’ll work with anyone and everyone who has the same objective of combating obesity and … helping people with diabetes,” said Senator Barnett, who has type 1 diabetes.

“I don’t see any conflict of interest at all.

“I support full disclosure and at every forum (their sponsorship) has been noted and advised … it’s fully transparent and that’s why I wrote the letter (to the pecuniary interest register).”

The forums had also been supported by Diabetes Australia and a range of other organisations, he said.

Novo Nordisk had sponsored the forum for the past two years – there have been seven forums since 2002 – and paid $5000 towards the conference in 2005, he said.

Novo Nordisk communications manager Tina Wall said the senator had approached the company about supporting the forum and it had accepted because it fitted with “our corporate mission to defeat diabetes”.

There was no product advertising at the forum, but the company logo was on a banner and on carry bags, she said.

She denied there was a conflict because the forum was “about obesity, which we don’t sell any drugs for”.

Nordisk was doing some “early research … in that area, but we have not got to the product stage yet”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909