corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8702

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

FDA warns drugmakers over unapproved headache drugs
Reuters 2007 Mar 2
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2007-03-02T142156Z_01_N01257482_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-HEADACHE-FDA-DC.XML&WTmodLoc=SciHealth-C4-Health-3


Full text:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has ordered 20 companies, including Novartis AG’s Sandoz unit, to stop marketing a number of unapproved drugs used to fight headaches, the agency said on Thursday.

The FDA sent warning letters to eight manufacturers, which also included Ivax Pharmaceuticals Inc., recently acquired by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Twelve distributors also were warned.

Like other approved products for migraine and other headaches, the drugs contain the active ingredient ergotamine tartrate. But they have been manufactured and distributed without undergoing review by the FDA, the agency said.

“Doctors and patients often do not realize that not all drugs that are available on the market are backed by FDA approval,” said FDA’s Deborah Autor, who oversees compliance issues. She added that fewer than 2 percent of prescription medications are unapproved.

“Drugs that skirt the approval process may be unsafe, may not work, and in our experience, often have inadequate labeling,” she said in a statement.

The unapproved ergotamine tartrate drugs do not carry necessary cautions against their use in patients also taking the metabolic enzyme inhibitor CYP 3A4 found on labels for similar approved headache drugs, the FDA said.

Such inhibitors can include certain antibiotics, antifungal treatments and protease inhibitors.

The FDA posted the letters, dated February 26, on its Web site at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/wlcfm/date.cfm?MONTH=2&YEA R=2007

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.