corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8700

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Fisk MC.
Lilly, Two Other Drugmakers Sued by Pennsylvania
Bloomberg.com 2007 Mar 2
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601202&sid=at5JJXqTaO4U&refer=healthcare


Full text:

Eli Lilly & Co., AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals and Johnson & Johnson were sued by Pennsylvania over claims they fraudulently marketed antipsychotic drugs and owe the state for prescription costs and harm to patients.

Lilly, based in Indianapolis, hid the risks and exaggerated the benefits of its antipsychotic medication Zyprexa while persuading doctors to prescribe it for unapproved uses, the state said. London-based AstraZeneca Plc’s U.S. unit did the same for its drug Seroquel and Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen Pharmaceutica unit for Risperdal, Pennsylvania claimed in a Feb. 26 complaint.

It’s the fifth claim on behalf of a state Medicaid program against Lilly over Zyprexa marketing practices, the second against New Brunswick, New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson over Risperdal and the first against AstraZeneca, the U.K.‘s second- largest drugmaker. More states are considering such lawsuits, attorney Tommy Fibich said in an interview.

``This is the biggest state so far,’‘ said Fibich, who represents Louisiana against Lilly and Johnson & Johnson. The Pennsylvania case ``could cost the companies hundreds of millions of dollars,’‘ he said.

AstraZeneca and Lilly representatives said the companies will defend themselves vigorously. Janssen spokeswoman Ambre Morley said the company doesn’t comment on litigation.

``The lawsuit is being undertaken by a Houston, Texas, law firm that has filed hundreds of personal injury lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies on behalf of private individuals,’‘ AstraZeneca spokesman Jim Minnick said in an interview.

Programs for Elderly

``Lilly is committed to the highest ethical standards and to promoting our medications only for approved uses,’‘ spokeswoman Tarry Ryker in an e-mailed statement. ``Zyprexa has helped millions of people with serious mental illness regain control of their lives.’‘

The defendants cost Pennsylvania’s Medicaid and drug assistance for the elderly program millions of dollars for ``reimbursing for non-medically accepted indications and non- medically necessary uses of Zyprexa, Seroquel and Risperdal,’‘ as well as ``significant sums of money for the care and treatment’‘ of patients injured by the drugs, the state said in a complaint.

The lawsuit was brought by Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell’s office of general counsel, which hired private lawyers to help pursue the claims, Rendell spokesman Gary Miller said. The state doesn’t have an estimate of the total amount of damages, Miller said.

The drugs, part of a class of newer antipsychotics, are approved for use for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The companies marketed them for unapproved uses, including mood and behavior disorders, attention-deficit disorder and dementia, the state said.

Top-Selling Drugs

The three drugs are among the top-selling medications in the world. Seroquel’s worldwide sales in 2006 were $3.4 billion. Lilly had global sales of Zyprexa of $4.36 billion in 2006, and Risperdal sales were $4.18 billion.

Pennsylvania is seeking reimbursement for money paid for prescriptions, plus payments for health problems caused by the drug. Pennsylvania is also entitled by law to $10,000 for each false claim made through the state’s drug assistance to the elderly program and double damages for such claims to Medicaid, Miller said.

The drugs have been linked to excessive weight gain and an increased risk of diabetes. In September 2003, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration required Lilly and the other companies to place warnings on the drugs’ labels.

Lilly has been sued by four other states on behalf of Medicaid programs. Louisiana sued in 2004. West Virginia, Alaska and Mississippi filed similar suits in 2006, seeking reimbursement of money spent on the drug, as well as the costs of past and future medical care for any injuries caused by Zyprexa use. The Alaska suit is set for trial in March 2008.

Settled

Lilly settled about 28,500 claims brought by users of Zyprexa for as much as $1.2 billion. About 1,300 individual claims remain, the company said in a regulatory filing last month.

The company also faces government probes into marketing of the drug and a lawsuit filed in New York in 2005, on behalf of private health insurers, seeking reimbursement of money spent on prescriptions and alleged Zyprexa-related illnesses.

AstraZeneca has been sued by almost 10,000 individuals in U.S. state and federal courts over claimed injuries from Seroquel. Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen unit has fewer claims involving Risperdal.

Johnson & Johnson shares fell 50 cents to $61.95 at 4:23 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Lilly shares fell 48 cents to $51.77. AstraZeneca American depositary receipts, each representing one ordinary share, fell $1.24 to $53.84.

The case is Commonwealth v. Eli Lilly & Co., 002836, February Term 2007, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (Philadelphia).

To contact the reporter on this story: Margaret Cronin Fisk in Southfield, Michigan, at mcfisk@bloomberg.net .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909