Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8673
Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.
Publication type: Journal Article
Garattini S, Bertele' V.
[False innovations in clinical research].
Recenti Prog Med 2006 Nov; 97:(11):611-7
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=17252717&dopt=Abstract
Abstract:
Pharmaceutical innovation is actually poorer than it seems, largely because of “false” innovations. Various factors help create an image of novelty in the pharmaceutical area. These factors act throughout the research and development process and in the post-marketing stages affecting the selection of study hypotheses, the adoption of the appropriate study methodology, and the interpretation and publication of results. Each of these steps may be diverted from the priority objective of patients’ interest and shifted towards to the defence of the drugs companies’ commercial interests. Regulators, NHS, physicians and patients must be vigilant to recognise and get rid of false innovations which can prevent the use of more effective and safer drugs and waste resources useful for effective treatments in other areas. Rewarding this lack of innovation discourages research for excellence and reduces the competitiveness of the pharmaceutical industry.
Keywords:
Publication Types:
English Abstract
Review
MeSH Terms:
Biomedical Research/standards
Biomedical Research/trends*
Commerce
Conflict of Interest*
Drug Approval*
Drug Industry/standards*
European Union
Humans
Investments/ethics
Italy
Patient Care
Physician's Role
Notes:
[Article in Italian]
