corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8658

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Coombes R.
Having the last laugh at big pharma
BMJ 2007 Feb 24; 334:(7590):396
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/334/7590/396


Abstract:

How campaigners are creating humorous videos to hit back at the drug industry

Satire is becoming the latest weapon of campaigners against the influence of drug companies. A series of wickedly clever parodies has been posted in recent months on internet sites such as YouTube (www.youtube.com) and has quickly proved successful in communicating an anti-“big pharma” message to a wide audience.

The most popular spoofs in circulation target direct to consumer drug advertising, which was legalised in the United States in 1997 and is now a mainstay of the country’s television advertising. The object of the lampooning is the way in which drug companies, it is suggested, turn ordinary ailments into medical problems. The new breed of satirists claim that prescription drug advertisements are now so powerful that they can convince well people that they are sick and need the advertised drug.

The current buzz is around a mock advertising campaign for “Havidol” (as in “Have it all”), a sharply observed . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963