corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8642

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Lee J.
Regulator halts ads for weight loss drug
The Sydney Morning Herald 2007 Feb 27
http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/regulator-halts-ads-for-weight-loss-drug/2007/02/26/1172338548085.html


Full text:

PHARMACEUTICAL company Roche’s plans to make its controversial weight loss drug Xenical a household name have been dealt a severe blow.

The National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee has decided to stop it advertising directly to the consumer.

Roche Products said it would not appeal against the decision to revoke its licence to advertise. The regulator found Xenical’s marketing generated increased demand among consumers who might not need the drug.

Roche managing director Fred Nadjarian yesterday predicted sales would inevitably fall as consumer awareness dropped off.

Xenical leads the market in weight loss products sold in pharmacies with a quarter of the $95 million in annual sales, according to ACNielsen.

It was set to extend its lead over rivals Reductil and Duromine when it won permission last year to advertise directly to consumers.

“There are probably other options [open to us] but we aren’t going to pursue them,” Mr Nadjarian said. “We are out of energy on this … If there was another body to whom we can appeal to then we might, but as it’s the same body of people it’s unlikely.”

Xenical will still be available in pharmacies but Roche argues that the void in consumer awareness will be filled by complementary medicines that are allowed to advertise freely but are prevented from carrying claims as bold as those of pharmaceutical products.

“We won’t be able to advertise yet products with dubious ingredients largely based on green tea extract, eye of newt, wing of bat and guinea pig tails can,” Mr Nadjarian said in a veiled attack on leading complementary weight loss brand, Fatblaster, which has under 3 per cent of the total market.

A Fatblaster spokesman responded: “Natural products are efficacious and low risk, appealing to a totally different consumer. For Xenical to compare their sales to the low-risk natural products category is like claiming car companies are scared of bicycle sales.”

Xenical, which is known to have side effects such as diarrhoea and incontinence, became one of the few able to advertise directly to the public following its re-listing as an over-the-counter medication in 2004.

Two months into its campaign the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Council ordered the ad off air after complaints by consumer advocate Choice that it was targeting teenage girls by advertising around Australian Idol.

The TGAC’s complaints committee dismissed that claim but found that Roche had breached a code which prohibits “inappropriate or excessive usage”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909