corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8641

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Vitamins A and E shorten, not lengthen life, review suggests
CBC News 2007 Feb 27
http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/02/27/antioxidants-risks.html#skip300x250


Full text:

The antioxidant supplements beta carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E may increase the risk of death rather than helping health, a new review suggests.

In Wednesday’s Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers in Denmark concluded some of the most common antioxidants increase the risk of dying, based on their analysis of 68 studies on more than 25,000 people.

About 10 to 20 per cent of adults in North America and Europe take supplements, according to the study.

“Beta carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E given singly or combined with other antioxidant supplements significantly increase mortality,” Dr. Goran Bjelakovic of the Center for Clinical Intervention Research in Copenhagen and his colleagues wrote.

“There is no evidence that vitamin C may increase longevity. We lack evidence to refute a potential negative effect of vitamin C on survival. Selenium tended to reduce mortality, but we need more research on this question,” the authors write.

Given that tens of thousands of Canadians take daily vitamin supplements in the hopes of preventing or slowing cancer or cardiovascular disease, the public health consequences of the findings are great, the researchers said, noting the supplements are heavily marketed.

Antioxidant activity
Antioxidants act like mops in the body, cleaning up free radicals that are thought to damage cells leading to illness.

As for why antioxidants may increase mortality, the researchers suggest it could be that eliminating free radicals interferes with a defence mechanism.

“Antioxidant supplements are synthetic and not subjected to the same rigorous toxicity studies as other pharmaceutical agents,” the team concluded. “Better understanding of mechanisms and actions of antioxidants in relation to a potential disease is needed.”

Not all supplements are created equal, agreed John Biggs, a nutritional counselor in Edmonton. Biggs said he prefers supplements made from foods rather than synthetic varieties.

“If there was anything that I think this study showed it is that taking a fragmented incomplete spectrum of a man-made synthetic vitamin may not be the best thing for your health,” Biggs said.

Foods best source
But the study overstates the risk of death and understates potential benefits, according to Dr. Neil Fleshner of Toronto’s Princess Margaret Hospital, an expert on antioxidants and cancer.

“So you have an excess of two deaths per thousand deaths perhaps attributed to the antioxidants,” Fleshner said. “And of course these are largely short-term studies and it says nothing about the other potential longer-term benefits it may have 15, 20 or 25 years down the road.”

Until there is evidence of how antioxidants work or in what combinations, Fleshner does not recommend antioxidants.

Nutrition experts see the study as further proof that the best supplement is a healthy diet. Health Canada said it will review the latest study.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909