corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8577

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Lee AM.
Interdependence of prescription drugs and other health care costs
Drugs Healt -Care 1975; 2:(2):75-85


Abstract:

Some of the major misconceptions concerning the economic structure of the pharmaceutical industry and its market are examined. Cost controls applied to drugs in isolation can increase costs in other sectors of health care. Further, drugs have been the least inflationary factor in health care costs; the average size-adjusted prescription charge in 1974 was lower, in current dollars, than in 1960, while per capita disposable income doubled over the same period. Multiple versions and variations of a drug provide both therapeutic and price competition, and the costs of this product proliferation are overshadowed by the social benefits. The high marketing expenditures of research based manufacturers serve a legitimate purpose in communicating information on the availability and proper use of prescription drugs to physicians. The high average rate of return on investment, as measured by conventional accounting procedures, tends to overstate the profits of industries with a high investment in advertising and research. Premiums which one brand of a drug may command over other versions not only supply necessary profits but provide the cash flow required to support heavy research investments, including investments in basic research. Savings in government reimbursement for multiple source drugs projected under the Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC) program of HEW are overestimated and might easily be exceeded by the administrative costs of the program. Effective utilization review, including review of drug prescribing, and better physician access to information on drug prices, can foster rational drug therapy and reduce waste in drug expenditures more effectively than can arbitrary controls imposed solely on the drug component of health care.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909