corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8572

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Hammel RW, Holberg PA.
Ban the use of pharmaceutical trademarks?
Medical Marketing and Media 1976 May; 11:28, 30, 32-37


Abstract:

An anonymous questionnaire was sent to randomly selected samples of 300 pharmacists and 300 physicians practicing in Wisconsin to measure and assess attitudes towards the concept of banning the use of trademarks in the prescription drug industry. Results showed that 44% of the pharmacists and 29% of the physicians responding favored the proposal to prohibit pharmaceutical trademarks. The type of pharmacy practice did not have a significant relationship to pharmacists’ opinion, but a large majority of physicians in private practice, as opposed to those in hospital practice, were against the proposal. Likewise, both pharmacy and medical practitioners with the least amount of practice experience tended to favor the proposal more than did more experienced practitioners. Finally, few pharmacists or physicians thought adopting the proposal would improve the quality of patient care.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.