corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8543

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Makers campaign harder for votes of RPhs dispensing generically
American Druggist 1980 Oct; 182: 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 56, 58, 6


Abstract:

A survey on the drug product selection of community pharmacists when dispensing prescriptions allowing a choice between generic and brand name products is presented. Pharmacists from chain store and independent pharmacies were included in the nationwide survey. Of the 42 drugs covered by the 1980 survey, 36 were also included in the 1979 survey. Of all of these, the company that led in pharmacists’ preferences in 1979 is still the leader in 1980 but on 30 of the 36, the leader’s margin in 1979 was reduced in 1980 and in 14 cases was reduced considerably. Results also showed that on many drugs, the growing strength of generic name houses is evident in the vying for the second place. In other cases, gains at the second place level were shown by companies marketing branded generics. Tabulations comparing the findings of the 1979 and 1980 surveys on the 42 drugs covered with separate data given for the preferred manufacturers reported by the chain and the independent pharmacists as well as by all the pharmacists combined are presented.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909