corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8540

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Strickland HODGE, Jepson MH.
Typing prescribers by reaction to medical detailing
Chemist and Druggist 1981 Feb 21; 215:346, 352


Abstract:

A study designed to determine which doctors would be good prospects for prescribing a new drug by using certain criteria which help to characterize the doctors and the analyses of prescriptions and prescribing patterns is described. The preference and use of drug information sources, the size of the practice, qualifications, specialization, and length of practice were some of the variables used as well as the number of prescriptions issued and the number of different preparations prescribed in each therapeutic class of drugs. Results showed that the type of information sources preferred, the size and length of practice, number of prescriptions issued and the number of different preparations prescribed in a therapeutic class are variables significantly related to the susceptibility to drug promotion and the probability of the early prescribing of new drugs.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963