corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 851

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Reuters .
Glaxo: Justice Dept Probes Drug Pricing
REUTERS 2005 Mar 9


Full text:

GlaxoSmithKline Plc (GSK.L), Europe’s biggest drugmaker, said the U.S. Department of Justice was investigating whether certain of its pricing policies violated Medicaid rules.

The company, which disclosed the probe in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission late on Tuesday, said it was cooperating in the investigation by government attorneys.

GSK said it had provided documents and information about so-called nominal pricing arrangements for a number of products.

The attorneys involved in the case are the same ones that are investigating whether a number of companies, including GSK, inflated average wholesale prices of drugs, which are used to determine how much Medicaid pays for products.

Under regulations governing Medicaid — the U.S. government’s health plan for the poor — drugmakers are required to report the lowest price of a medicine.

The Department of Justice is now studying whether some of GSK’s nominal pricing arrangements may have violated civil statutes or laws.

Glaxo shares were trading 0.6 percent higher at 1,277 pence at 4:55 a.m. EST.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963