corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8373

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Griffith WA, Cangemi RR.
Direct-to-consumer Rx ads? Drug firms see pluses, minuses
Drug Topics 1995? May 20; 129:60-61


Abstract:

To determine how pharmaceutical manufacturers feel about advertising prescriptions directly to consumers, a questionnaire was mailed to 88 senior marketing executives at drug companies all over the country. Responses were received from 55 companies representing 40% of the prescription sales. It was shown that about 24% of the respondents indicated that their firms are planning to advertise, while 33% were uncommitted. Some 43% stated that their firms are not planning to advertise to consumers. A majority of respondents (79%) believed that not all prescription drugs should be promoted to the public. About 80% of all respondents said that direct-to-consumer ads of prescription drugs would increase sales. On the debit side, a majority of respondents (50%) indicated that consumer advertising could result in increased exposure to product liability lawsuits. Most respondents favored the monitoring of prescription drugs. Finally, the majority of respondents did not believe that consumer advertising of Rx products would lead to higher health costs.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.