corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 827

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

BBC News.
Rules issued on patient restraint
BBC News 2005 Feb 22


Full text:

Physically restraining violent mental health patients should be a last resort and measures must be taken to protect the aggressor, guidance says.
But the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) stopped short of setting a maximum time psychiatric patients should be restrained.

The guidance was issued following the death of David “Rocky” Bennett who died after being restrained at a clinic.

NICE said the advice would help safeguard NHS staff and patients.

The guidance said restraint or tranquillisation should only be considered once all other calming methods had failed.

If a patient did need restraining, their head and neck should be supported by one member of the NHS team, NICE said.

Key NICE guidance Physical restraint should be the last resort Patients head and neck should be supported during restraint NHS staff who deal with potentially violent patients should have training to recognise signs Mental health service providers to produce risk management strategies

Staff dealing with potentially violent mental health patients in hospitals should be trained to recognise anger and other risk factors as well as how to protect the patient from harm.

But the NICE proposals did not include one of the key recommendations put forward by the inquiry into the death of Mr Bennett.

The 38-year-old collapsed in 1998 after he was held face down for 25 minutes after hitting another patient – who went on to attack and racially abuse him – and punching a female nurse.

Inquiry head Sir John Blofeld recommended last year that no patient should be held in a prone position for more than three minutes.

But NICE said it was impossible to put a maximum time limit on restraint.

Chief executive Andrew Dillon added: “Managing violent behaviour is about more than drugs and restraint.”

Training to identify and deal effectively with violent behaviour without resorting to drugs or physical restrain will only work if there is a major increase in the number of nurses Marjorie Wallace, Sane

He said the guidelines, which will be used by the Healthcare Commission in its inspections, will help to safeguard patients in both mental health settings and accident and emergency departments.

Ian Hulatt, of the Royal College of Nursing, agreed it was not practical to put a limit on the length of restraint.

But he added: “I think these guidelines will serve both patients and NHS staff well.”

But Mr Bennett’s sister Joanna said: “I’m extremely disappointed. They haven’t adequately addressed the issues that have been raised.

Dr Bennett said she was particularly upset that no time limit had been imposed on the amount of time someone could be restrained.

Mental health charity Sane chief executive, Marjorie Wallace, said the NICE advice was “a sensible way forward”.

“However, training to identify and deal effectively with violent behaviour without resorting to drugs or physical restrain will only work if there is a major increase in the number of nurses and improvement in the state of psychiatric wards.

“While these shortages and conditions remain, it will be difficult for nurses to sustain relationships and respond to early signs of disturbed or violent behaviour.”

And Mind chief executive Richard Brook said: “We are dismayed that the guidelines do not specify a maximum time limit for physical restraint.

“Failure to introduce a maximum time limit for restraint seriously threatens the well-being of some of the most vulnerable people in the mental health system.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909