corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8166

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Meyer H.
The pills that ate your profits.
Hosp Health Netw 1998 Feb 5; 72:(3):18-22


Abstract:

The attempts of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) to reduce prescription drug outlays, despite a wave of direct-to-consumer ads for pricey new drugs, by cutting the number of drugs they will pay for and by hiking copays, are discussed. It was noted that prescription drugs now account for as much as 15% of total medical costs for some plans, up from less than 10% historically. HMOs and pharmacy benefits management firms aim to narrow huge variations in physicians’ prescribing routines, but it is a delicate task. They cannot afford to jeopardize quality or inadvertently shift patients into costlier forms of care. The opposing forces of managed care health plans and drug manufacturers in determining pharmacy costs in hospitals are considered.

Keywords:
Advertising Cost Control/methods Cost Sharing Drug Costs* Drug Industry Drug Utilization/economics Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data* Formularies Health Maintenance Organizations/economics* Humans Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services Physician's Practice Patterns/statistics & numerical data United States

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963