corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8115

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Doucette WR, Schommer JC.
Consumer preferences for drug information after direct-to-consumer advertising
Drug Information Journal 1998; 34:(4):1081-1088


Abstract:

The effects of patient age, self-perceived medication knowledge, and the context of exposure to direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising on consumers’ preferences for information from 6 sources, including physicians, pharmacists, nurses, family members or friends, medical reference books, and product manufacturers, about the benefits, risks, and costs of prescription drugs were assessed in a postal survey of a random sample of 360 households in the United States. Of 331 deliverable surveys, 150 (45.3%) were returned and analyzed. The results showed that patients’ age and knowledge exerted significant influence on their preferences for information about the benefits, risks, and costs of prescription drugs. The patients preferred physicians and pharmacists as sources of information about drugs seen in DTC advertisements.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909