corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8087

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

't Hoen E, Charveriat C.
What could be more of a short-term fix than the Novartis programme?
Financial Times 2007 Jan 29
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/680576de-af3d-11db-a446-0000779e2340.html


Full text:

Sir, The statement by Dan Vasella, chief executive of Novartis, that the company may have “a longer-term perspective than activists looking for short-term fixes” (“Novartis plea to Indian drug makers”, January 19) strikes us as odd considering the sustainability of Novartis’s donation programme – a true short-term fix.

Undoubtedly, the programme means that patients in India, who would not otherwise be able to afford more than $30,000 per year – what Novartis charges for the cancer drug Glivec – can have access to the drug. But donation programmes cannot guarantee treatment to all patients at all times, in all countries, for all diseases. Moreover, such programmes can be and have been withdrawn, cutting off the lifeline for poor patients. In fact, generic competition is the only globally proven solution to reducing the cost of medicines over the long term. In 2000, first-line antiretroviral drugs cost up to $10,000 per patient per year, but thanks to generic competition, today’s price is just $136 per patient per year.

Novartis’s call for generics companies to supply Glivec free is nonsensical, given that it is actively pursuing a court case against India that would prevent any generics company from even producing Glivec, let alone supplying it for nothing.

The consequences of Novartis’s relentless pursuit of a patent for Glivec through the courts could extend far beyond this one drug. India now recognises patents in accordance with the rules of the World Trade Organisation and this will already have negative consequences on India’s ability to continue to be the developing world’s pharmacy – 50 per cent of Aids medicines in the developing world are Indian generics. Novartis is now seeking through the courts even higher levels of patent protection than India is obliged to provide under international trade rules.

The implications are that India will be unable to produce many life-saving generic drugs, with dire consequences for millions around the world.

Celine Charveriat,

Head of Make Trade Fair,

Oxfam International

Ellen ‘t Hoen,

Director Policy Advocacy,

Médecins Sans Frontières Campaign for Access to Essential Medicines

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909