corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7853

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Integrity in Science.
NIH Halts Neonatal Herpes Session after Protest
Integrity in Science 2007 Jan 22
http://www.cspinet.org/integrity/watch/200701221.html#1


Full text:

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases abruptly cancelled a conference on neonatal herpes aimed at writing clinical practice guidelines shortly after a coalition of influential physicians and consumer groups protested the lack of balance and conflicts of interest among the meeting’s presenters (see Integrity in Science Watch, 1/8/07). A letter sent to NIH, signed by 44 physicians and 16 health groups, called on director Elias A. Zerhouni to adopt an agency-wide rule prohibiting scientists with financial conflicts of interest from sitting on guideline-writing panels. NIH has not yet responded to the request.

The letter, whose signers included Lancet editor Richard Horton and two former New England Journal of Medicine editors, Marcia Angell and Jerome P. Kassirer, pointed out that many recent NIH-sponsored guideline-writing panels have been dominated by physicians with conflicts of interest. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s guideline-writing committees on hypertension and cholesterol management, for instance, had 9 of 11 and 8 of 9 members, respectively, with conflicts of interest. With insurers moving toward adopting pay-for-performance standards that would reward physicians who follow widely accepted clinical practice guidelines, the letter asked: “Why should either practicing physicians or patients have faith in guidelines written by researcher-physicians with ties to providers whose financial well-being is driven by the content of those recommendations?” Consumers groups signing the letter included the Center for Medical Consumers, the National Research Center for Women & Families and the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which led the effort.

The NIAID letter cancelling the meeting told registrants that there had been “a misunderstanding about the intent of the meeting.” However, the agenda sent to invitees throughout December included a final session led by Richard Whitley of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who consults for anti-herpes drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline. The printed agenda’s bullet points for that final session were “Codification of guidelines,” “Writing Teams” and “Deadlines.”

In mid-December, the Wall Street Journal ran a front page story describing how GlaxoSmithKline, which makes the anti-herpes medication Valtrex (valacyclovir), has funded researchers and continuing medication seminars to promote universal herpes testing among pregnant women, which could lead to significantly higher drug sales.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








There is no sin in being wrong. The sin is in our unwillingness to examine our own beliefs, and in believing that our authorities cannot be wrong. Far from creating cynics, such a story is likely to foster a healthy and creative skepticism, which is something quite different from cynicism.”
- Neil Postman in The End of Education