corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7794

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Business Wire.
Plaintiff Drops VIOXX(R) Suit against Merck Five Weeks Before First Trial in Philadelphia State Court
Business Wire 2007 Jan 22
http://www.merck.com/newsroom/news-release-archive/corporate/2007_0122.html


Full text:

WHITEHOUSE STATION, N.J.—(BUSINESS WIRE)—Just five weeks before trial was set to begin in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Angela McCool voluntarily dismissed with prejudice her lawsuit against Merck & Co., Inc. in which she alleged that VIOXX caused her husband’s heart attack and death. The case was selected for trial by plaintiff’s counsel and would have been the first VIOXX case to go to trial in Philadelphia.
ADVERTISEMENT

“We believe that our evidence was strong in this case and Merck was prepared to go forward with the trial,” said Ted Mayer of Hughes Hubbard & Reed, Merck’s outside counsel.

In this case, Angela McCool alleged that VIOXX caused her husband’s heart attack and death even though her husband experienced symptoms of heart trouble long before he took VIOXX and had several risk factors for heart disease, including hypertension, high cholesterol and obesity.

Litigation Status

As of September 30, 2006, the claims related to more than 3,000 alleged VIOXX users have been dismissed before being scheduled for trial. Of those, more than 1,100 were dismissed with prejudice either by plaintiffs themselves or by judges, meaning they cannot be filed again. The other 2,000 were dismissed without prejudice.

Of the 29 plaintiffs whose claims have been scheduled for trial, including the plaintiff in this case, the claims of seven were dismissed, the claims of seven were withdrawn from the trial calendar by plaintiffs, juries have decided in Merck’s favor nine times and in plaintiffs’ favor four times, and there have been three mistrials (one of which has since been retried to a verdict in Merck’s favor). A state judge set aside one of the nine Merck verdicts.

As for the four plaintiffs’ verdicts, Merck already has filed an appeal or sought judicial review in each of those cases, and in one of those four, a federal judge overturned the damage award shortly after trial.

For information regarding additional cases scheduled for trial in 2007 visit http://www.merck.com/newsroom/vioxx/.

About Merck

Merck & Co., Inc. is a global research-driven pharmaceutical company dedicated to putting patients first. Established in 1891, Merck currently discovers, develops, manufactures and markets vaccines and medicines to address unmet medical needs. The Company devotes extensive efforts to increase access to medicines through far-reaching programs that not only donate Merck medicines but help deliver them to the people who need them. Merck also publishes unbiased health information as a not-for-profit service. For more information, visit www.merck.com.

Forward-Looking Statement

This press release contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the statements. The forward-looking statements may include statements regarding product development, product potential or financial performance. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed, and actual results may differ materially from those projected. Merck undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Forward-looking statements in this press release should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect Merck’s business, particularly those mentioned in the cautionary statements in Item 1 of Merck’s Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2005, and in its periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, which the Company incorporates by reference.

Contact:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Media:
Kent Jarrell, 202-230-1833
Beth Sanzone, 202-577-3398
Investor:
Graeme Bell, 908-423-5185

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963