corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 775

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Cresswell A.
Drug companies threaten price hikes
The Australian 2005 Jan 25


Full text:

Patients may be slugged up to $32 more for common medicines if drug companies fail to persuade the Federal Government to water-down its plan to slice 12.5 per cent off the price it pays for some drugs available on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

A confidential briefing document drawn up by the drug industry at the request of patient groups, a copy of which has been obtained by The Australian, also warns that drug companies may withdraw some existing medicines used by small numbers of patients.

“Under the Government’s proposed new pricing laws, some new medicines will simply not be available in Australia at all, or will only be made available years after their registration in other parts of the world,” the document says.

Federal Health Minister Tony Abbott last night insisted the reforms were “about getting decent value for the Australian taxpayer, without any reduction in the availability of medicines”.

According to the industry, drugs that could be affected by surcharges – which would be paid by the patient at the pharmacy in addition to the existing PBS co-payments – include some of the most frequently prescribed medicines.

The class of drugs known as “statins” – used to lower blood cholesterol – could be hit with a surcharge of between $8 and $32 every time a patients fills out a prescription, according to the document.

The Federal Government announced the 12.5 per cent savings policy at the height of the election campaign. It was then projected to save $830 million over four years, which was earmarked for extra payments for pensioners and self-funded retirees.

Under the policy, the price the Government pays for all the drugs in a single therapeutic class – such as statins – will fall by 12.5 per cent whenever a generic version of any of the drugs in that class enters the market.

The reductions are cumulative, so that if four brand-name drugs in one class come off patent – as will happen with blood-pressure drugs in 2006-07 – all the drugs in the class will be hit with a total price cut of more than 40 per cent.

The cuts will not flow through to patients who will continue to pay the existing PBS co-payments. These were increased on January 1 to $28.60 for general consumers, and to $4.60 for concession-card holders.

Patient groups such as Diabetes Australia and Arthritis NSW have expressed concern at the policy.

John Montgomery, chairman of the Generic Medicines Industry Association, said his industry would be “badly hurt” by the plans.

A spokesman for Medicines Australia said the brand-name industry had “concern about the future of certain medications remaining available for patients in Australia”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909