corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7745

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Smith NV, Ramseyer KE.
Taking the package insert into the electronic age
Drug Information Journal 2002; 36:(2):429-434


Abstract:

The United States Package Insert, often referred to as the package insert (PI), contains information critical to appropriate prescribing of pharmaceutical products. This printed document evolves throughout the life cycle of a product, and under Current regulated dissemination methods, having the PI physically accompany the product may not provide information to prescribers, Pharmacists, and other health care providers as efficiently as proposed enhanced dissemination methods. To overcome this and other inherent problems of present PIs, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America established a task force. This task force published a white paper detailing the idea of a real-time electronic version of the package insert (ePI). However, opposition to this transition abounds from multiple sources. To better assess the opposition to and the impact of the ePI on pharmacists and pharmacy practice, information was collected through a survey at the 2000 American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacists Midyear Clinical Meeting in Los Vegas, Nevada. Results of this survey demonstrate that 65% of the individuals questioned claim they have never heard of the idea of an ePI, 57.5% reported printing out a PI from a company Web page, and 77.5% of those sun,eyed thought that dissemination of the PI should change to an electronic format. Pharmacists are well positioned to be integral in the successful transition to an ePI.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963