corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7727

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Johnson LA.
Drug companies better on clinical trial info
Associated Press 2007 Jan 11
http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070111/BUSINESS/701110334/1003/BUSINESS


Full text:

Drug companies are doing a much better job of supplying key information about their research since medical journals started pressuring them to enter studies in a government registry.

The federal registry, at www.clinicaltrials.gov, began operating in 2000 but saw little industry participation until late 2004. That was when the 11 members of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors said they would publish only studies registered early on, in part to keep drug companies from suppressing the results of experiments that did not turn out the way they wanted.

New England Journal of Medicine Editor in Chief Dr. Jeffrey Drazen and Dr. Deborah A. Zarin of the National Library of Medicine, which operates the registry, reported on its progress in an editorial in today’s issue.

Only 8 percent of the 2,983 studies that drug makers added to the registry last year failed to describe the outcomes being measured in the experiment, such as cholesterol levels or deaths. That was down from 26 percent of studies registered in the prior years.

Meanwhile, none of the 2006 filings omitted the name of the treatment being tested, as did a small number of trials registered before 2006, Drazen and Zarin wrote.

The pharmaceutical industry has sometimes withheld information in the past, calling it commercially sensitive.

“Although more can be done, this improvement in registration quality is to be praised,” Drazen and Zarin wrote.

Previously, they reported in the journal that drug makers still were leaving out details in the period from May through October 2005 — a month after the new mandate took effect.

At the time, they noted Pfizer Inc. was the worst at reporting names in its new listings, leaving out more than 6 percent. Last year, none of the 115 trials it registered left out the treatment or outcome being tested.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend