corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7720

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Seale C, Chaplin R, Lelliott P, Quirk A.
Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: a qualitative study of psychiatrists' experiences.
Soc Sci Med 2006 Jun; 62:(11):2861-73
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VBF-4HTCW4X-2&_user=10&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2006&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=74ce4497ec7a40842640f3f860672138


Abstract:

In psychiatry, and in treating people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in particular, there are obstacles to achieving concordant, shared decision making and in building a co-operative therapeutic alliance where mutual honesty is the norm. Studies of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia have revealed critical views of medical authority, particularly over the issue of enforced compliance with antipsychotic medication. Psychiatrists are known to place particular value on such medication. This qualitative study reports the views of 21 general adult psychiatrists working in UK about their experiences of consultations involving discussion of antipsychotic medication. Interviewees reported a general commitment to achieving concordant relationships with patients and described a number of strategies they used to promote this. In this respect, their self-perception differs from the picture of authoritarian practice painted by critics of psychiatry, and by some studies reporting patients’ views. Interviewees also described obstacles to achieving concordance, including adverse judgements of patients’ competence and honesty about their medication use. Explaining the adverse effects of medication was perceived to discourage some patients from accepting this treatment. Moments of strategic dishonesty were reported. Psychiatrists perceived that trust could be damaged by episodes of coercion, or by patients’ perception of coercive powers. We conclude that a self-perception of patient-centredness may not preclude psychiatrists from fulfilling a social control function.

Keywords:
Psychiatry; Antipsychotic medication; Schizophrenia; Psychosis; Decision making; Concordance; UK MeSH Terms: Adult Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use* Decision Making* Female Great Britain Humans Interviews Male Middle Aged Patient Participation* Psychiatry* Qualitative Research Referral and Consultation* Schizophrenia/drug therapy Substances: Antipsychotic Agents

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend