corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7719

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Okunade AA, Suraratdecha C.
The pervasiveness of pharmaceutical expenditure inertia in the OECD countries.
Soc Sci Med 2006 Jul; 63:(1):225-38
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VBF-4J624TM-1&_user=10&_coverDate=07%2F31%2F2006&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=1596f3d919f2591333460cb8c9cb073a


Abstract:

This paper constructs and estimates an economic model for testing statistically the strength of possible ‘expenditure inertia’ as a plausible reason for rising drug expenditures of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. The ethical drugs sector in the OECD health care systems is increasingly targeted as the major culprit in the rising cost. Using multiple regression analysis, and the maximum likelihood estimation method, the data of each country (taken from OECD Health Data, 1997) were first tested for functional form optimality with the Box-Cox power family transformations model. Drug expenditure elasticities, at data means, were computed using each country’s optimal regression model estimates. The results indicate that the traditionally fitted a priori limited functional form models (e.g., linear, log-log) are not globally consistent with data across countries. The effect of a one-period lagged real per-capita drug expenditure (capturing inertia or habit persistence) on current period real per-capita prescription expenditure is statistically significant in most countries. Pharmaceutical demands are inelastic, and tend to behave like a necessity, as expected. Since the significant effects of economic, demographic, and other drivers of high drug spending differ across countries, country-specific implications and policy suggestions for cost controls ought to differ.

Keywords:
OECD countries; Rising pharmaceutical spending; Spending inertia; Expenditure elasticities; Health system policies Publication Types: Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH Terms: Aged Developed Countries Drug Costs* Female Health Expenditures* Health Policy* Humans Likelihood Functions Models, Econometric Multivariate Analysis Regression Analysis

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.