Healthy Skepticism Library item: 768
Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.
 
Publication type: news
Hallam K, Jensen K.
Pfizer Faces Republican Assault on Drug Import Ban
Bloomberg News 2005 Jan 26
Full text:
Pfizer Inc., Merck & Co. and fellow drugmakers thought Republican congressional majorities and President George W. Bush’s re-election created a firewall against legal prescription-drug imports. The wall is starting to crack.
Eight U.S. representatives and senators, including five Republicans, today unveiled a bill that would allow Americans to import cheaper drugs from Canada and other countries. Yesterday, Democratic Senator Byron Dorgan of North Dakota and Republican Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine won a promise from Majority Leader Bill Frist for a hearing on their own proposal.
``We have for the first time people in the Senate and in the House who are on the same page,’‘ Representative Gil Gutknecht, the Minnesota Republican who wrote a 2003 bill that passed the House, said at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington. ``This is a new day in this whole debate.’‘
Lawmakers are responding to pressure from voters and state governors dismayed by U.S. drug prices that are rising 10 percent a year, while governments in Canada and elsewhere keep prices as much as 70 percent lower. Ten governors, including four Republicans, last week wrote to Frist, a Tennessee Republican, urging passage of a drug-importation measure.
``If we don’t establish this with good law, Americans are going to revolt,’‘ Senator Jim DeMint, a South Carolina Republican, said at the press conference. The group of eight lawmakers made a few changes to Gutknecht’s 2003 bill and introduced it in the Senate on Monday and the House yesterday.
Movement in CongressHank McKinnell, chief executive of New York-based Pfizer, the world’s biggest drugmaker, raised more than $200,000 to help re-elect Bush, whose campaign opposed drug importation on safety grounds. With all 435 House members and a third of the Senate up for re-election next year, Republican control of Congress and the White House may not guarantee the drugmakers a firewall.
``We’ve gotten some movement in both the House and the Senate,’‘ said David Certner, director of federal affairs for the senior-citizens’ group AARP, in an interview yesterday. ``There does seem to be a fair amount of popular support.’‘
Certner said he believes majorities in the House and the Senate would support a bill ``if we could ever get it to a vote. You have opposition from the White House and the leadership. It still remains a possibility, something that we’re going to continue to push.’‘
Dorgan Wins HearingWhile Senate Majority Leader Frist hasn’t agreed to allow a vote, e did promise at least a hearing on the matter. In return, Dorgan withdrew his threat to block the confirmation of Michael Leavitt as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services until a vote on the measure was set. The Senate confirmed Leavitt’s nomination today.
``We are determined to pass drug importation legislation in the Senate this year,’‘ Dorgan and Snowe said in a joint statement yesterday. ``It is unfair for the pharmaceutical industry to charge American consumers the highest prices in the world for prescription medicines.’‘
Their bill is separate from the bicameral legislation rolled out today by Senators DeMint, David Vitter of Louisiana, Ken Salazar of Colorado and John Thune of South Dakota and Representatives Gutknecht, Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, Anne Northup of Kentucky and Sherrod Brown of Ohio. Vitter, DeMint, Thune, Gutknecht and Northup are Republicans.
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Judd Gregg, a New Hampshire Republican, today planned to introduce a third drug-import bill with four other Republicans: Gordon Smith of Oregon, Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. The measure is identical to the one Gregg proposed last year.
Lower Costs``Brand-name drugs cost 40 to 80 percent less in Canada than in the United States,’‘ Gregg said in a statement. ``As a result, patients are crossing borders and turning to rogue Internet pharmacies in an effort to afford their medicine. But these marketplaces are perilous. It would be irresponsible to ignore the public health consequences of the status quo.’‘
Smith, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Aging, held a hearing today on the cross-border purchases.
``We have become so focused on debating whether importation should be legalized, we have lost track of the reality that importation is happening,’‘ Smith said in a separate statement.
The governors who wrote to Frist urging legalized drug imports included Republicans Jim Douglas of Vermont, John Hoeven of North Dakota, Jon Huntsman Jr. of Utah and Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, and Democrats John Baldacci of Maine, Rod Blagojevich of Illinois, Jim Doyle of Wisconsin, Brian Schweitzer of Montana, Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas and Thomas Vilsack of Iowa.
Six members of the same group, half of them Republicans, asked Jan. 19 to meet with Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin on his government’s plan to bar cross-border drug sales.
Drugmakers ObjectThe financial arm of the Texas legislature in Bush’s home state found importing medicines might save $898 million over two years and should be studied, the Houston Chronicle reported.
``Despite a procession of studies showing the flaws of importation, the idea persists,’‘ said Jeff Trewhitt, a spokesman for the Washington-based Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, which represents Pfizer and other drugmakers. ``The testimony and the examples have fallen on deaf ears. I don’t know why. It’s frustrating.’‘
Americans spent about $1.4 billion in 2003 to import drugs, half of them from Canada, according to a Dec. 21 report by a Health and Human Services agency task force. A Sept. 20 Harris Interactive poll found that two-thirds of Americans think pharmaceutical costs are ``unreasonably high,’‘ and eight of every 10 seniors surveyed in an Aug. 10 Harvard University poll supported drug importation.
Possible CounterfeitsThough importation of prescription drugs is illegal, U.S. authorities generally don’t pursue purchases of medicines for personal use. The HHS report estimated that examining the 10 million packages imported in 2003 would have cost $3 billion.
Drugmakers argue that allowing purchases in Canada would open the floodgates to counterfeit medicines from other nations. Americans who expect to receive a drug made in a factory approved by U.S. drug regulators might end up with a fake, they say.
``Up to one-third of the Internet pharmacies that purport to be Canadian are not,’‘ Phrma’s Trewhitt said. ``Patients are being defrauded and not getting what they paid for.’‘
Congress is already investigating the safety of drugs sold in the U.S. after the Sept. 30 withdrawal of Whitehouse Station, New Jersey-based Merck’s Vioxx painkiller. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican, and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton, a Texas Republican, started probes of the Food and Drug Administration.
In a letter accompanying the task-force report on drug imports, departing HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson said Bush advisers might recommend a veto of legislation allowing the cross- border purchases unless they could be proved safe. The president has never vetoed a bill.
Bush May Veto``It will be brought up a lot,’‘ said Jennifer Duffy, an analyst at the nonpartisan Cook Political Report in Washington.
``There are people who will try to attach that to everything. I can’t see Bush signing one.’‘
After considering three importation proposals last year, the Senate failed to follow the House of Representatives, which passed Gutknecht’s bill in 2003.
``I’m very hopeful that now that this coalition is united, the executive branch will reassess their position,’‘Representative Northup said at the press conference today. ``I believe the president has gotten bad advice.’‘