corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7580

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Kubesova H, Holik J, Weber P, Polcarova V, Matejovsky J, Mazalova K, Slapak J.
[Drug consumption and risks of polypharmacotherapy in elderly population]
Cas Lek Cesk. 2006; 145:(9):708-11
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=17091726&query_hl=32&itool=pubmed_docsum


Abstract:

BACKGROUND: One of our previous studies was aimed at the consumption of prescribed drugs by the elderly population. The average per day number of drugs was 4.6 (maximum 13). Existence of freely obtainable drugs with massive advertisements brings a question, how many of those drugs it is necessary to add in order to estimate probability of interaction and undesirable drug effects. In order to achieve valid information, students of the sixth year of General medicine program during their practical course at general practitioners were asked to interview randomly selected senior patients. They asked on the number, type, and price of freely obtainable drugs which they use. Data were evaluated from interviews accomplished during academic years 2001/2002 and 2004/2005.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Our cohort included 252 men and 148 women with average age of 78.7 years. Average number of freely obtainable drugs was 2.26 at the beginning and 2.32 at the end of study. Only 34% of questioned did not buy any of those drugs at all or only exceptionally, 66% reported buying once a month or weekly. 44% of seniors buy analgetics, 58% buy vitamins, 37% food supplements, 36% non steroid antirheumatics, 46% cold prevention drugs, 30% anti-constipation drugs. Contrary to our expectation, positive correlation between the sums given for the personal participation on the drug costs and that given for freely obtainable drugs was found. It is not possible to expect, that polymorbidic patient with several prescribed drugs would buy less of freely obtainable drugs even due to the financial requirements.

CONCLUSIONS: Freely obtainable drugs, many of them composites, can represent significant source of interactions and undesirable drug effects. They can also significantly modulate compliance of the senior. The high percentage of seniors buying freely obtainable drugs requires aimed questions on the pharmacological history.

Keywords:
Publication Types: English Abstract MeSH Terms: Aged Czech Republic Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data* Drugs, Non-Prescription Female Humans Male Polypharmacy* Prescriptions, Drug Substances: Drugs, Non-Prescription


Notes:

[Article in Czech]

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909