corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7573

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Edwards J.
Pharma Giants Face BBB Scrutiny
Brandweek 2007 Jan 15
http://www.brandweek.com/bw/news/pharmaceutical/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003532441


Full text:

NEW YORK — Abbott Labs, Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer were all the subject of rulings from the advertising police Friday.

The decisions, from the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, signal that major drug companies are not afraid to challenge each other’s marketing for their over-the-counter brands.

In two cases, Pfizer lost a challenge to Johnson & Johnson’s itch-cream marketing and Abbott Labs lost a challenge to its infant formula ads from Nestle. Abbott vowed to change its advertising.

In the infant formula case, Nestle had argued that Abbott’s Ross Products division was wrong to claim that its Similac Isomil Advance was better than other brands at reducing fussiness, spit ups and gassiness in babies. In the evidence it had for its claims, Ross “did not test the advertised product,” NAD said.

In a statement, Ross said it would “follow NAD’s specific recommendations in future advertising.”

Johnson & Johnson may have only just completed its acquisition of Pfizer’s consumer brands business for $16.6 billion in cash, but that didn’t stop Pfizer from complaining about J&J’s Cortaid ads.

The NAD ruled against Pfizer’s complaint about J&J’s advertising for Cortaid Advanced 12 Hour Anti-Itch Cream. The ads in question claimed superiority over other brands for relief from itching over 12 hours.

Pfizer argued that J&J’s evidence for the claims amounted to “an indirect laboratory test” which established only that the cream remains on the skin for 12 hours.

But the NAD decided that J&J had adequate support for its claims. Specifically, “The advertiser submitted evidence that included the results of a controlled randomized, investigator blinded, head-to-head study which tested more than 70% of the market of over-the-counter 1% hydrocortisone brands.”

That type of test is the gold standard in superiority testing. NAD also noted that Pfizer failed to demonstrate that J&J’s evidence was flawed and failed to come up with better data showing different results.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909