corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7318

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: report

Rost P
Whistleblower: Confessions of Healthcare Hitman
: AHRP and Soft Skull Press 2006 Nov 8
http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/413/29/


Abstract:

This book is a blow by blow description of Dr. Rost’s experience as an
insider—indeed a high-level pharmaceutical executive turned whistleblower.
Dr. Rost first blew the whistle on Wyeth’s global tax evasion scheme in
which Wyeth made payments to its foreign employees to escape taxes. He then
blew the whistle on Pharmacia’s illegal, off-label, marketing of Genotropin,
a human growth hormone. When Pharmacia was swallowed up by Pfizer, his
situation dramatically worsened—except for his savvy inroads with the media
and politicians. Dr. Rost focused mainly on the lie promoted by Big Pharma
about the invented danger of reimportation of prescription drugs.

Although most of the book describes one man’s struggle against corporate
hard ball tactics and intimidation—despite laws protecting whistleblowers—his chapter,

How Corrupt Is the Drug Industry? provides the milieu in which this industry operates. Giant pharmaceutical corporations that once were held in high esteem, have earned criminal wrap sheets—much like mobsters, not life-savers:

Below is a partial list of pharmaceutical corporate wrongdoing described in Peter Rost’s book:

In 2001: “TAP-Astra Zeneca Pay Over a Billion Dollar in Fines”—re: criminal marketing of Lupron.

In 2002: Pfizer paid $49 million to settle state and federal Medicaid fraud charges involving Lipitor.

In 2002: Schering-Plough signed a FDA consent decree and paid a $500 million fine—the biggest in FDA history.

In 2004; Schering-Plough paid $345 million to resolve criminal and civil liabilities for illegal marketing of Calritin.

In 2004 Pfizer admitted criminal marketing of Neurontin, agreeing to pay $420 million.

In 2003: Bayer pled guilty to violating the federal Prescription Drug Marketing Act, paying $257 million including a criminal fine for its marketing of Cipro.

In 2004, Merck withdrew its lethal painkiller, Vioxx. Estimates are that it would cost the company $50 billion.

In 2004: The IRS served Merck with a “preliminary notice of deficiency” that could lead to $2.04 billion.

In 2003: GlaxoSmithKline shareholders questioned GSK CEO, Jean-Pierre Garnier, about his pay package to which he responded: “I am not Mother Teresa.”
GlaxoSmithKline also ran afoul of the IRS—it is facing a demand for $7.8 billion in backdated taxes and interest.

In 2003, GSK signed a corporate integrity agreement and paid $88 million in a civil fine for overcharging Medicaid for the antidepressant, Paxil and nasal-allergy spray, Flonase.

In 2004; New York State Attorney General slapped GSK with fraudulent marketing of Paxil—the company settled and posted its previously concealed pediatric clinical trial data.

In 2005 the Justice Department announced that GSK had paid “over $150 million to resolve allegations of violations to the False Claims Act through fraudulent drug pricing and marketing.”

In 2004 Bristol-Myers Squibb was ordered by the Securities and Exchange Commission to pay $150 million to settle charges of inflating its revenue by $1.5 billion in 2000 and 2001.
A separate criminal investigation by the U.S. Attorney General’s Office in NJ resulted in the indictment of two executives for securities fraud—the company agreed to pay $300 million to shareholders.

In 2000: Wyeth signed an FDA Consent Decree and paid $30 million.
In 1997, Wyeth, after pulling Pondimin and Redux off the market because of heart valve damage, the company was forced to set aside $21.1 billion to settle “fen-phen” liability cases.

In 2005: Serono Laboratories (Switzerland) agreed to pay $704 million to resolve criminal and civil charges in connection with the marketing of Serostim, an AIDS drug. The company also pled guilty to marketing conspiracy.

In 2005: Eli Lilly pled guilty and paid $36 million for its illegal marketing of Evista for off-label uses.

On Sept. 8 Public Broadcasting System (PBS) broadcast a report in a new series—
America’s Investigative Reports— “A Bitter Pill” showing other corrupt practices by
this industry, the harm suffered by human beings: “Every prescription medicine you take is tested on humans before it’s approved for sale and use by the Food and Drug Administration. But if you assumed those tests are always done smartly, safely and ethically under the watchful eye of expert regulators, you would be very, very wrong. Perhaps even dead wrong.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909