corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7145

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Conflicted Scientists to Sit on FDA Board Weighing Suicide Risk from Antidepressants
Ingegrity in Science 2006 Dec 11
http://www.cspinet.org/integrity/watch/200612112.html


Full text:

Conflicted Scientists to Sit on FDA Board Weighing Suicide Risk from Antidepressants

The Food and Drug Administration has issued three waivers for this week’s advisory committee meeting that will review data on adult suicide risk from antidepressants. Andrew Leon, professor of public health at Weill Medical School, Cornell, and a permanent member of the committee, received between $10,001 and $50,000 per year as a member of a data monitoring board for an “affected firm.” Leon has consulted for Cyberonics, makers of the Vagus Nerve Shock Therapy System which treats severe depression, and Cortex Pharmaceuticals, which makes a class of compounds used for Alzheimer’s and depression. In addition, Leon’s research has been sponsored by Forest Laboratories, which makes Celexa, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Bruce Pollock, from the Rotman Research Institute in Toronto, who will not be allowed to vote in on the issue, receives less than $10,001 per year sitting on the advisory board and speakers bureau for an antidepressant maker. Pollock also advises and speaks on behalf of Forest Labs, which makes the best-selling antidepressants Celexa and Lexapro; GlaxoSmithKline, maker of the antidepressant Paxil; and Pfizer, maker of Zoloft, a popular anti-depression drug. The third waiver was issued to Jean Bronstein, a retired nurse and consumer representative for the committee, who has stock valued from $5,001 to $100,000 in two affected drug firms.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909