corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7121

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Simons J.
Big Pharma's new R&D center: the trash bin: Drugmakers are getting desperate for growth, and are hoping a little serendipity might bring them the next Viagra.
CNN Money.com 2006 Dec 5
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/12/11/8395439/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote


Abstract:

Making blockbuster drugs may be highly profitable – but it’s never been efficient.

A pharmaceutical company hoping to find, say, a new cancer drug will often invest seven or eight years and tens of millions of dollars only to end up with … a drug that doesn’t fight cancer. And then? Well, suck it up and start over.

But wait, what if that failed cancer drug could cure athlete’s foot?

That sums up the new zeitgeist taking hold inside growth-starved Big Pharma, where a trend called “repositioning” is all the rage. Over the past year the industry’s chief scientists have begun hiring specialty biotech firms to put their previously discarded experimental compounds – some that failed in clinical trials as long as 20 years ago – through batteries of new tests.

The hope is that they’ll stumble on a “happy accident” – when a medication intended for one treatment winds up being highly useful (and lucrative) treating something entirely different. Folly? Not necessarily. Consider that Pfizer’s erectile dysfunction blockbuster Viagra started out as an experimental heart medicine – a $1 billion-a-year accident.

Perhaps the most prominent player in this new game – amid scores of competitors, including a growing number in India – is Maryland’s Gene Logic (Charts). Last winter the tiny, publicly traded biotech signed on with Pfizer (Charts) and Roche. And in October it announced a deal with Eli Lilly (Charts).

The companies won’t discuss the specific drugs or diseases they’re reviewing – or the specific terms of payment. But Gene Logic CEO Mark Gessler says deals are typically structured so that his company receives milestone payments based on lab breakthroughs and then a “high single digit” percentage of sales if the medicines make it to market.

So far Gene Logic and its peers have yet to find the new Viagra, but on paper, repositioning appears to work for everyone. As companies go after more difficult disease targets, Big Pharma is amassing huge arsenals of drugs that fail in the latter stages of clinical development.

“This is one of the many things Big Pharma needs to be doing to improve productivity,” says Frank Douglas, director of MIT’s Center for Biomedical Innovation. “It makes sense to analyze a compound in as many diseases as you can.” And for Gene Logic, one accident could make its shareholders very happy.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963