corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7118

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Steyer R.
FDA Staff Supports Sanofi Drug
The Street.com 2006 Dec 13
http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/newsanalysis/pharmaceuticals/10327685.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA


Abstract:

A Food and Drug Administration staff report says the benefits of the Sanofi-Aventis (SNY – commentary – Cramer’s Take – Rating) antibiotic Ketek outweigh the risks.
The staff report, issued Wednesday, comes one day before a pair of FDA advisory committees will hold hearings on the drug that the agency approved in April 2004.

Ketek has become controversial because post-marketing reports show several cases of liver damage and death. The company has toughened warning labels, and a big clinical trial used in support of Ketek’s application was later found to be unreliable.

In addition, the Senate Finance Committee has been investigating the FDA and the Ketek-approval process. The committee’s chairman, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said that the FDA “intentionally withheld key information” from an advisory committee when that panel reviewed the Ketek application in January 2003.

FDA staff reports are routinely issued before advisory panels meet. Wednesday’s report suggests continued monitoring of Ketek for liver damage, a further strengthening of the label and greater communication to doctors about patients who are most susceptible to side effects.

The regulatory agency has noted that Ketek has been linked to “rare cases of serious liver injury and liver failure with four reported deaths and one liver transplant.” Sanofi-Aventis revised its label to reflect this information.

The advisory panels will assess whether Ketek’s risks outweigh its benefits for each of three indications — community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial sinusitis and acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis — now approved by the FDA. The drug is given to pneumonia patients who contract the disease outside a hospital or extended-care facility.
The FDA staff report says that side effects identified after Ketek reached the market and questions about clinical trials may have the most impact on assessing the drug’s pros and cons in treating sinusitis and bronchitis, “which are often self-resolving conditions.”

The advisory panels could vote on strengthening the Ketek label, or they could recommend keeping, restricting or withdrawing FDA approval for any of the indications. The FDA isn’t bound by advisory panel recommendations, but it usually follows them.

Although these advisory groups are only supposed to comment on Ketek, sometimes panels make more sweeping recommendations. If they do, their suggestions could affect the development and testing of potential competitors to Ketek and to other types of antibiotics.

Sanofi-Aventis says the drug produced about $50 million in U.S. sales for the first half of 2006.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909