corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7109

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Ahead of the Bell: Genentech, Biogen: Analysts See Little Impact on Genentech and Biogen From Drug Related Death Disclosure
Yahoo Finance 2006 Dec 19
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/061219/biogen_ahead_of_the_bell.html?.v=1


Abstract:

NEW YORK (AP) — Wall Street analysts are largely shrugging off a recent disclosure of deaths from unapproved use of a drug developed and marketed by Genentech Inc. and Biogen Idec Inc.
Late Monday, the Food and Drug Administration said it wants more information on the cancer treatment Rituxan after Genentech and Biogen said two people died while using the treatment for an off-label condition.

The patients were using Rituxan to treat Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, an autoimmune condition, and died from a viral disorder called progressive multifocal leuklencephalopathy, or PML, according to the companies. The drug is approved for treating non-Hodgkins lymphoma and other conditions.

Analysts noted that the drug’s association with PML is already listed on its label, and that PML could be caused by other conditions.

“In our view, there is little proof of cause-and-effect as a result of these two reported cases of PML,” wrote Rodman & Renshaw’s Michael G. King Jr. in a client note. He kept a “Market Outperform” rating and an $87 target price on shares of Genentech.

Credit Suisse’s Michael Aberman, meanwhile, said the news could cause delays in approvals for other uses of Rituxan. He kept a “Neutral” rating on Genentech and trimmed his target price to $84 from $85.

“While we do not think this announcement will have an impact on oncology sales, we believe it will change physician perception (whether deserved or not) on the safety of Rituxan in autoimmune disease,” wrote Aberman.

But May-Kin Ho of Goldman Sachs sees little impact on Genentech, and said doctors are comfortable with risks associated with the drug.

Baird Equity Research’s Christopher J. Raymond likewise said he does not expect the news to have much of an impact. He reiterated a “Neutral” rating and $55 target price on the stock.

Genentech fell 62 cents to $80.34 in premarket trading after closing at $80.96 Monday on the New York Stock Exchange.

Shares of Biogen dropped $2.53, or 5 percent, to $47.70 in early activity after closing at $50.23 Monday on the Nasdaq.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909