corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7020

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Dolan M.
Scientist made deal with drug firm
Baltimore Sun 2006 Dec 9


Abstract:

A senior government scientist originally from Baltimore pleaded guilty yesterday to accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in undisclosed fees from the same drug manufacturer whose public-private research collaboration he oversaw.
As part of his agreement with federal prosecutors, Pearson “Trey” Sunderland III, chief of the geriatric psychiatry branch of the National Institute of Mental Health, which is part of the National Institutes of Health, is expected to receive a sentence of two years’ supervised probation and must forfeit $300,000 in illegal proceeds and reimbursements.
His ethical misdeeds came to light after a series of newspaper stories led to a congressional investigation into the federal government’s premier collection of research centers based in Bethesda.
With proper disclosure and approval, NIH scientists are allowed to receive outside income. But the discovery of dozens of private financial arrangements between drug companies and publicly employed scientists has embarrassed the agency in recent years and led to yesterday’s plea.
“This case is not a technical mistake,” Maryland U.S. Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein said at a news conference after Sunderland’s plea. “This case is not an honest mistake.”
The state’s chief federal prosecutors said Sunderland “violated the fundamental rule” of being a government scientist who both oversaw a research partnership with an outside company and cut an outside deal to enrich himself on the same project.
Sunderland, whose father was the owner of Chesapeake Cadillac and a century-old carpet-cleaning firm, was charged Monday with conflict of interest. Yesterday, he admitted accepting payments from Pfizer Inc. without authorization from his superiors and ethics watchdogs.
According to the plea agreement, he must also complete 400 hours of community service.
“Essentially, it’s not a civil settlement,” said U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz before accepting the scientist’s plea in a Baltimore courtroom. Motz accepted the plea but has final say over the sentence. Sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 22.
After the hearing, Sunderland declined to comment on the case through his lawyer, Robert F. Muse. The 55-year-old scientist, who lives in Chevy Chase, could have been sentenced to up to one year in prison if convicted at trial.
NIH officials have said that more than 40 scientists at the agency are thought to have engaged in outside, fee-based relationships with private companies. Almost none of them were charged with crimes. Instead, officials said, the scientists were disciplined internally or retired from the agency.
Rosenstein declined to say whether he planned to prosecute other scientists on similar charges.
Congressional leaders have said the case raises fundamental questions about the management of the National Institutes of Health, founded in 1887 and considered one of the world’s foremost medical research centers. The organization employs more than 18,000 people.
According to court papers filed by prosecutors, Sunderland was required under agency rules to disclose all income earned from outside activities and travel expenses exceeding $260 that were reimbursed by outside sources. In addition, before engaging in outside employment, Sunderland was required to file a form disclosing the name of the outside organization, the nature of the employment and any anticipated compensation.
In late 1997, representatives of Pfizer approached Sunderland about his agency joining a scientific collaboration. It was to involve researchers at Pfizer and NIH who were searching for Alzheimer’s biomarkers, physical traits in the blood or cerebral spinal fluid indicating the presence and progress of the disease.
Prosecutors said that Sunderland joined the collaboration but did not tell his bosses that he cut a side deal for personal payments from Pfizer on the same project.
During his five years as a consultant, Pfizer paid Sunderland $125,000 in retainer fees, $35,000 to attend company meetings and additional money for related travel expenses, court documents show. Sunderland did not disclose to his supervisors at the National Institute of Mental Health the nature of his work and compensation from Pfizer.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909