corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6942

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Lalonde A.
Selling, or selling out? [response]
Journal of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada 2000; 22:(7):497


Abstract:

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) recently issued a press release in support of a direct to consumer information campaign developed by a pharmaceutical company. Data quoted (on abortion rates and The 1998 Canadian Contraceptive Study) substantiates the SOGC’s position that Canadian women must have information on birth control. While the SOGC does not necessarily agree with the contents of the ad campaign initiated by Wyeth-Ayerst the SOGC does support the basic premise that Canadian women should be provided information on contraception and should discuss their contraceptive needs with their health care provider and ask questions. The SOGC continues to support direct-to-consumer information programmes and is actively involved in the development and implementation of various consumer health education programmes.

Keywords:
*policy statement & guideline/Canada/

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.