corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6833

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Law J.
Assessing the impact of direct-to-consumer advertising
Scrip Magazine 1998 Nov; (73):21-22


Abstract:

According to a survey by Prevention Magazine more than 12 million Americans have received prescription drugs as a direct result of having seen them advertised. This finding is cited by the study as evidence of how effective DTCA is in promoting both public health and prescription medicines. However other groups such as Health Action International see the figures as evidence of inappropriate prescribing fueled by DTCA. This controversy is one reason why the Food and Drug Administration announced plans to conduct its own study. The amount of money being spent by the industry on DTCA is growing rapidly because of the changes in the FDA regulations about broadcast advertising. One reason that DTCA has found such a receptive audience is that it comes at a time when Americans are increasingly disillusioned with the healthcare they receive and want to do something about it.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/direct-to-consumer advertising/DTCA/HAI/Health Action International/ analysis of prescribing pattern/ consumer behaviour & knowledge/doctors/general public and consumers/FDA/Food and Drug Administration/regulation of promotion/promotion costs and volume/attitude toward promotion/patient demands/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: CONSUMERS/PATIENTS/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: CONSUMERS AND PATIENTS/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PRESCRIBING, DRUG USE/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: COMPLIANCE, SANCTIONS, STANDARDS/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: DIRECT GOVERNMENT REGULATION/VOLUME OF AND EXPENDITURE ON PROMOTION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963