corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6827

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: report

Public Citizen’s Health Research Group
Comments on: Food and Drug Administration: attitudinal and behavioral effects of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs
: Public Citizen’s Health Research Group 1998 Sep 28
www.citizen.org


Abstract:

The Food and Drug Administration is planning a survey to examine consumers’ reactions and behaviours that stem from direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. Public Citizen supports a strong research role for the FDA. Public Citizen has two observations that are pertinent to the proposed survey: 1) the public is not protected from deceptive DTCA by physician gatekeepers; 2) drug company censorship has prevent public access to objective prescription drug information for 19 years. Public Citizen believes that the FDA survey should address two questions: 1) do consumers opinions about the risks and benefits of prescription drugs, as communicated in DTCA, change when consumers are presented with objective comparative risk and benefit information about the drugs that are being promoted; 2) does DTCA stimulate the sales of drugs that are less effective, more expensive and with potentially greater risks over older drugs already on the market.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/Food and Drug Administration/FDA/DTCA/direct-to-consumer advertising/consumer behaviour & knowledge/quality of information/attitude toward promotion/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: CONSUMERS/PATIENTS/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: CONSUMERS AND PATIENTS

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.