corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6818

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: report

Consumer and physician attitudes toward direct-to-consumer advertising
: Time Inc. 1998 Aug


Abstract:

This report presents information gathered from a national survey of consumers and doctors. Nearly 2/3 of consumers were aware of ads for allergy medication with television being the prime source of ad awareness. No other sources of ad awareness, other than magazines and television were mentioned by more than 7% of consumers. Over 1/4 of consumers discussed the contents of the ad with a healthcare professional. Of those who spoke to a healthcare professional, 1/4 claimed to have received a prescription for the product advdertised. Over half took no action as a result of seeing advertising. The majority of consumers felt that clearly stating all risks associated with the medication was either extremely important or important when advertising directly to consumers. Two-thirds felt that providing a toll-free number, having enough time to sutudy the ad,and being able to prevent children from seeing the ad were important. Over half claimed that magazines were the most appropriate form of media for DTCA. Sales representatives are a very important source of information for doctors, more so for learning about pharmaceutical products than learning about the latest developments in their field. Direct-to-consumer advertising was considered one of the least important sources of information for doctors. In a 6 month period, doctors claim that approximately 12% of their patients asked for a prescription drug by name and that they fill this request 45% of the time.

Keywords:
*analytic survey/United States/DTCA/direct-to-consumer advertising/attitude toward promotion/source of information/doctors/ consumer behaviour & knowledge/ analysis of prescribing pattern/ broadcast advertisements/ print advertisements/ sales representatives/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: CONSUMERS/PATIENTS/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: CONSUMERS AND PATIENTS/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PRESCRIBING, DRUG USE/PROMOTION AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION: CONSUMERS AND PATIENTS/PROMOTION AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION: DOCTORS/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: DETAILING


Notes:

Methodology note: The consumer survey was done by telephone and therefore excludes people without a phone. Only seven physician specialties were surveyed and therefore the results may not be generalizable to the other specialties. The method of randomly selecting the doctors is not described. Only office based doctors were surveyed. The physician response rate was only 21% and respondents and nonrespondents were not compared. In both surveys there is a possibility of a social acceptability bias in the responses.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909