corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6817

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Sheldon T.
Drug promotion—how ethical is direct-to-consumer advertising?
Scrip Magazine 1998 Jul-Aug; (70):21-22
www.pjbpubs.co.uk/scrip/scrhome.html


Abstract:

The new report by Health Action International describes an inherent conflict of interest between the legitimate business goals of the pharmaceutical industry and the social, medical and economic needs of providers and the public to select and use drugs in the most rational way. This conflict has lead to the growing lack of clarity between commercial product information intended to increase sales and independent, objective information about a drug. The promotion of direct-to-consumer medications that attracts the most controversy. Industry representatives argue that extreme cases of DTCA abuse could not take place in countries with well regulated systems and that DTCA can empower consumers. Barbara Mintzes who wrote the HAI report rejects this argument. The report concludes by pressing for all drug promotion to be regulated through legislation and monitored and enforced through national governments or independent bodies able to impose an escalating scale of sanctions.

Keywords:
*analysis/HAI/Health Action International/DTCA/direct-to-consumer advertising/industry perspective/regulation of promotion/ profit motive/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: CONSUMERS/PATIENTS/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: INDUSTRY/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: AUTONOMOUS BODIES/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: DIRECT GOVERNMENT REGULATION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909