corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6784

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: report

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
CDER 1997: report to the nation
: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1998


Abstract:

In fiscal year 1997, CDER issued 532 advisory letters to companies regarding their promotional materials for launch campaigns. CDER issued 183 regulatory action letters to pharmaceutical companies for prescription drug promotions determined to be false, misleading or lacking in fair balance. There were 240 letters issued in all categories regarding DTCA. The Center continued its research, education and outreach activities in support of providing consumers with easy to read information about their prescription drugs. CDER proposed standardization of over-the-counter drug label formats. Finally, CDER is conducting research to assess the public’s ability to understand risk versus benefit information.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research/safety & risk information/regulation of promotion/labeling/EDUCATING ABOUT PROMOTION: CONSUMERS AND PATIENTS/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: JOURNAL ADVERTISEMENTS/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: COMPLIANCE, SANCTIONS, STANDARDS/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: DIRECT GOVERNMENT REGULATION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.