corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6632

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Boerkamp EJ, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Reuyl JC, Versluis A.
The use of drug information sources by physicians: development of a data-generating methodology.
Soc Sci Med 1996 Feb; 42:(3):379-88
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VBF-3VWPKN3-29&_coverDate=02%2F29%2F1996&_alid=501643267&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_qd=1&_cdi=5925&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=1d21858b13b71b2a228e33ad94f0c0f6


Abstract:

The aim of this study was: (1) to develop and evaluate a methodology to determine hospital physician’s use of personal drug information sources; (2) a preliminary insight into the use personal drug information sources. Written case simulations appeared to be the most appropriate method. To construct the written case simulations a step-wise procedure was developed. In the first stage 5 internists formulated 35 complex cases from their daily practice in which they consulted drug information sources; after an evaluation by experts 20 cases were left over. Next, using a written questionnaire, these 20 cases were evaluated in a random sample of 50 internists according to criteria concerning aspects of the process, the contents and the context. Finally, we analyzed these ratings using an elimination-by-aspects decision rule, with the dominant criterion ‘need for consultation’. After this selection programme, two cases for each stage in the decision-making process of hospital physicians were selected which met the criteria. In general the colleague internist was the most frequently mentioned information source. Subspecialists and supporting specialists were considered less often and varied per stage in the decision-making process of physicians. The hospital pharmacist was hardly mentioned as a possible information source. The representatives of the pharmaceutical industry were not mentioned at all by the respondents.

Keywords:
Decision Making Drug Information Services/utilization* Female Health Services Research/methods* Humans Internal Medicine Male Medical Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data* Netherlands Pilot Projects Questionnaires *letter to the editor/Canada/Ontario Medical Association/doctors/ selling prescribing information/ pharmacies and pharmacists/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: PAYMENT FOR MEALS, ACCOMODATION, TRAVEL, ENTERTAINMENT/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: SELLING PRESCRIBING INFORMATION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909