corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6604

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: report

Wolfe SM
Testimony: FDA hearing on direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs
1995 Oct 19
www.citizen.org/hrg/


Abstract:

The primary purpose of advertising, either to physicians or to consumers, is to sell drugs and the history of both kinds of advertising demonstrates that such ads are designed to be as misleading and, sometimes, false as thy can get away with. In the area of physician drug advertising, the study by Wilkes and colleagues three years ago (Michael S. Wilkes, Annals of Internal Medicine 1992;116:912-919) demonstrated that a substantial proportion of clearly regulated physician ads-not previously cleared by FDA and going to an audience more knowledgeable than patients-were false or misleading. There is little question that, as exemplified in the tragic case of direct-to-consumer promotion of Lilly’s arthritis drug, Oraflex, patients, armed with misleading information, can greatly influence their physicians’ decision to prescribe a drug. The recent ad from Medical Marketing and Media, shows how eager the media are to convince drug companies that by taking out direct-to-consumer ads in their publications, they can reach, and influence, not only patients but also their physicians. The ad for Virazole, not “voluntarily” sent to the FDA for pre-approval, demonstrates how dangerous it can be to rely on a voluntary approach to regulating such ads. We favour a moratorium on DTC prescription drug advertising until FDA has in place a set of regulations aimed specifically at such ads, rather than using regulations intended to cover physician and other health professional advertising. In the alternative, while such regulations are being promulgated and finalized, FDA should be much more aggressive in insisting on prior clearnace of all such ads and taking appropriate enforcement actions whenever serious violations occur.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/direct-to-consumer advertising/DTCA/Eli Lilly/quality of information/quality of prescribing/ consumer behaviour & knowledge/ FDA/ Food and Drug Administration/ Opren and Oraflex/regulation of promotion/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: CONSUMERS AND PATIENTS/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PRESCRIBING, DRUG USE/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: DIRECT GOVERNMENT REGULATION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909