corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6465

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Madden J.
Drug firms challenge crackdown on gifts
The Australian Newswpaper 2006 Nov 28
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20832556-2702,00.html


Full text:

Drug firms challenge crackdown on gifts

James Madden
November 28, 2006

THE drug industry’s national body is challenging the competition
watchdog’s push to crack down on generous hospitality packages lavished
on healthcare professionals.

Under the tough new approach of the Australian Competition and Consumer
Commission, the gifts from drug companies to doctors would have to be
fully declared to patients and the public.

But Medicines Australia, which represents research-based pharmaceutical
companies, has objected to the “unduly onerous” conditions imposed by
the industry watchdog.

The matter arrived at the Federal Court in Sydney yesterday – four
months after The Australian revealed that Swiss drug giant Roche had
been accused of breaching the pharmaceutical industry’s code of conduct
by providing lavish meals to doctors at some of the country’s best
restaurants.

Medicines Australia has set the guidelines for the industry’s code of
conduct since 1960.

Each of the 14 editions in the code’s 46-year history has been
authorised by the ACCC, but now the watchdog has demanded a greater
level of disclosure from drug companies over the entertainment and
hospitality provided to doctors.

In one case, Roche is said to have spent more than $65,000 taking more
than 200 top cancer specialists and others to dinner at an exclusive
eatery in the Sydney Opera House.

The dinner, which was part of a Roche-sponsored meeting for doctors
specialising in blood disorders and cancers, cost more than $200 a head.
Industry guidelines state that company-sponsored meals should be “simple
and modest”.

At the time, Opposition spokesman for consumer affairs and health
regulation Laurie Ferguson said the meals funded by Roche were
“outrageous” and could be perceived as bribery and corruption.

The director of scientific and technical affairs at Medicines Australia,
Deborah Monk, told the court yesterday it was “an overriding tenet” of
the code of conduct that “hospitality be secondary to the educational
purposes” of any industry summit.

The hearing, before a three-member bench, is expected to finish on Friday.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909