corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6414

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

The Associated Press
Med Schools Warn of Drug Sales Pitches
The New York Times 2006 Nov 2
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Seductive-Drug-Marketing.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print


Full text:

Med Schools Warn of Drug Sales Pitches
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 10:57 p.m. ET

NEW YORK (AP) — Medical schools in several states are boosting programs that teach doctors and students to challenge the sales pitches of drug companies and avoid being dazzled by them.

The pharmaceutical industry spends billions of dollars a year on marketing to doctors — sometimes throwing lavish events to seal the deal on certain medicines.

Critics say slick promotion is unduly influencing how drugs get prescribed, sometimes to the detriment of patients. A small number of schools are now adding lectures and continuing education seminars aimed at persuading doctors to challenge claims made during sophisticated sales presentations.

‘‘We want to appeal to physicians’ natural skepticism,’‘ said Dr. Ethan Halm, an associate professor of medicine and health policy at Mount Sinai School of Medicine.

The prestigious Manhattan school is including a new type of training at its Morchand Education Center, famous for its use of actors to play patients.

For these sessions, the actors will play pharmaceutical company sales representatives. The students will be taught ‘‘how to effectively spar with the drug reps’‘ by asking aggressive questions, Halm said.

Another part of Mount Sinai’s program will advise health care providers how to tactfully deal with patients who see a drug on television and demand a prescription for it.

Almost daily, Halm said, doctors prescribe wonderful but lesser-known medications, only to have patients react as if they’ve been offered a second-rate imitation.

‘‘They say, ‘What about that thing the actor was using on TV? Can I get that instead? My insurance company is paying. Don’t give me the cheap stuff,’‘’ Halm said.

Drug makers say there is nothing nefarious about having salespeople meet with doctors to discuss a new drug, and many physicians may there is nothing wrong with listening to a sales pitch over dinner.

Adriane Fugh-Berman, an associate professor at the Georgetown University School of Medicine, said she lectured fourth-year medical students last year about drug company influence on doctors, and got a hostile response.

‘‘Physicians do not believe that they are affected by pharma,’‘ she said. ‘‘They all say the same thing: ‘We are too smart to be bought by a slice of pizza.’‘’

The number of medical school professors even willing to broach the subject with students in a significant way is still small, she added.

Stanford University in September joined a short list of institutions that have banned doctors from accepting gifts from drug industry sales reps. Others include Yale University and the University of Pennsylvania.

Dr. Jerome Kassirer, a professor at the Tufts School of Medicine and a frequent critic of the doctor-pharmaceutical relationship, said schools need to do more than just lecture.

‘‘The question to ask yourself about these programs is: What are the faculty doing? Because if the students walk away from those sessions and find out their faculty are off speaking for Pfizer, what are they going to think?’‘

An industry lobbying group, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, said sales reps help busy doctors understand the proper use, benefits and side effects of drugs.

‘‘They are providing information that is both informative and important for physicians to know about new medicines,’‘ said Diane Bieri, the group’s deputy general counsel.

Money for some of the university programs about drug advertising comes from a $430 million legal settlement over promotion practices at pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.