corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6246

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Blalock SJ, Patel RA.
Drug therapy concerns questionnaire: initial development and refinement.
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash DC) 2005 Mar-Apr 01; 45:(2):160-9


Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To develop a scale, designed for self-administration, to assess patient perceptions of drug therapy problems (DTPs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: California Central Valley. PARTICIPANTS: 200 community-dwelling adults taking at least one prescription medication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: 78 items assessing patient perceptions of DTPs. INTERVENTIONS: Self-administered questionnaire completed by study participants. RESULTS: Based on a Medication Evaluation and Response Model proposed in this article, items were developed to assess patient perceptions about potential or actual DTPs. Scales for five of the seven problem domains specified a priori were reliable based on participant responses: Perceived Efficacy, Overmedication Concerns, Adverse Drug Reaction Concerns, Adherence Issues, and Knowledge. Barriers and Intrusiveness were eliminated from, the questionnaire because of weak factor loadings. After making changes in domain assignment and eliminating redundant and weak items, five items remained in each of the five reliable scales, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.76 to 0.82. Each of the five scales was significantly associated with patient satisfaction with their medications. Individuals who reported fewer DTPs expressed greater overall satisfaction with their medications. In a forward stepwise regression analysis, four of the five scales exhibited independent associations with medication satisfaction, explaining 58.0% of the total variance in satisfaction [F(4,178) = 61.48, P < .0001]. Only the Knowledge scale failed to exhibit an independent association with satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The findings from this initial stage of scale development are encouraging. The association between the scales and medication satisfaction suggests that the scales may be useful in learning more about those factors that influence how patients evaluate their medications.

Keywords:
Cross-Sectional Studies Drug Monitoring/methods Drug Monitoring/statistics & numerical data* Drug Therapy/adverse effects* Factor Analysis, Statistical Humans Models, Theoretical Psychometrics/methods Questionnaires* Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909