corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6126

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Timmermans AE.
[Misleading advertisement on Opatanol].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2006 Jul 1; 150:(26):1472


Abstract:

In an advertisement in this journal, Alcon Nederland BV has recommended Opatanol (olopatadin) as the ‘first choice medication/NHG practice guideline for Red eye/Allergic conjunctivitis’. However, the practice guideline of the Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) mentions the following 3 antihistaminica as first choice for the treatment of red eye/allergic conjunctivitis: azelastin, levocabastin or olopatadin. Therefore, it is concluded that the Alcon advertisement is misleading.

Keywords:
Advertising* Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use* Conjunctivitis, Allergic/drug therapy* Dibenzoxepins/therapeutic use* English Abstract Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use* Humans Netherlands Practice Guidelines*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend