corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 606

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

McLaren S.
Cause and effect: prescription drug advertising goes under the microscope
Can Pharm JCan Pharm JCan Pharm J 1996; 129:(5):26-30

Keywords:
*analysis Canada DTCA direct-to-consumer advertising industry perspective Health Protection Branch Consumers’ Association of Canada Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Canada patient groups Medical Reform Group consumer behaviour & knowledge consumer groups ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: CONSUMERS PATIENTS ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: INDUSTRY ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: REGULATORS AND GOVERNMENT EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING SPONSORSHIP: PATIENT AND CONSUMER ORGANIZATIONS


Notes:

The article discusses the pros and cons of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs from various points of view: drug manufacturers, consumer and patient groups, Health Protection Branch and the Medical Reform Group, a group of left-wing Ontario physicians.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963