corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 5875

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Morris R.
Rats, Soy and Heart Disease: More shocking news
breadandmoney.com : The Free Radical Report 2006 Aug 11
http://breadandmoney.com/thefreeradical/


Full text:

Rats, Soy and Heart Disease: More shocking news
Richard Morris
August 11, 2006

by Richard Morris. This article first appeared in the Free Radical Report.

Rats!

That’s what I said after reading an intriguing article by Sue Ambrose with the Dallas Morning News. Rats are among the most widely used animals in medical research. Along with mice, they account for more than 90 percent of research animals. They have participated in literally thousands of experiments, contributing to several decades worth of knowledge. In fact, we owe much of what we know about cancer and heart disease to the lowly lab rat.

Now comes the news that many of those studies may have been inadvertently skewed, because of what the rats were fed.

Phytoestrogens are plant compounds that mimic the hormone estrogen. While these plant-based chemicals are known to be weaker than the hormones produced in the human body, they are also known to be powerful enough to exert an effect. Wheat, barley, corn and soy are just some of the ingredients found in rat chow, but it is soy, that ubiquitous ‘miracle’ food that is a primary source of phytoestrogens, in the form of isoflavones. Soy is also high in protein, which makes it a preferred ingredient in many popular rat food formulations.

There is a growing concern among researchers that the results of thousands of studies may have been affected by the amount of phytoestrogens in the rat’s diet. Most of what was learned in those studies eventually became the basis for human medicines, treatment and even government health policy.

Human foods derived from or containing unfermented soy have come under more strident attacks in the last few years as a growing body of evidence points to excess soy consumption as a potent contributor to killers like cancer and heart disease.

As if to support this contention, the article notes the following:

“The University of Colorado’s Leinwand said she stumbled on the chow issue when an employee switched a particular breed of mice from a soy-based diet to a milk protein-based diet in preparation for an experiment.

Suddenly, she said, it seemed like there was nothing left to study. The male mice, which ordinarily developed heart disease, were much healthier on the milk protein-based chow. Further studies implicated the soy hormones as part of the reason.”

Now consider that rats and mice are preferred for research because of their genetic similarities to humans. If a soy-based diet has been shown to accelerate heart disease in mice, what does that say about humans? People who believe they have nothing to worry about because they don’t consume much soy should think again. The relatively low-cost of soy production makes it a very attractive ingredient for many processed foods. Whether it’s baby formulas, baked goods, beverages, condiments or meat substitutes, soy is the processed food industries’ cash cow.

As for animal research, the only way to gauge the impact of plant estrogens on our knowledge of human health is to go back and replicate many of the key rat and mice studies using a phytoestrogen-free diet. Fat chance. Soy may be cheap, but research costs a bundle. It was noted in the article that switching to milk-based protein for lab rats adds to the cost of the research. Since a lot of research being done today is funded by companies with stingy accountants who abhor spending money unless it’s a matter of life and death, and sometimes not even then, change within the industry will probably occur at a glacial pace.

Evidently, despite the fact that milk appears to be a healthier source of protein, rats will continue to be fed soy and other less nutritious foods, perhaps well into the future…. Just like us.

Rats!

.,._

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909