corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 5760

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Hopkins Tanne J
FDA to clarify rules on advisory committee members
BMJ 2006 Aug 5; 333:(7562):278
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/short/333/7562/278?etoc%3e


Abstract:

The US Food and Drug Administration announced last week that it is to develop guidelines to clarify the relationships between members of its advisory committees and pharmaceutical companies. The aim is to make advisory committee processes more effective and to reassure the public about the integrity of the process.

There will be a period for public comment on the proposed new rules.

Some scientists with industry ties are granted waivers to allow them to participate in advisory committees, but the process is unclear.

The advisory committees provide expert advice and recommend whether the agency should approve new drugs and devices. The FDA usually, but not always, follows the committees’ advice.

Some critics say all experts with ties to industry should be excluded. Many academic researchers have no ties to industry, and they could serve on the advisory committees, say critics such as Merrill Goozner of the Center for Science in . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909